Satellite – Global program

Satellite - Global program

MAP Global Urology Network — Satellite Programme
MAP Global Urology Network · Programme Design Note 2025–2026 Confidential · Under the aegis of the Menon Academic Partnership
MAP
Menon Academic Partnership An initiative of the Menon Family Foundation

MAP Global Urology
Satellite Network

A cognitively driven educational intervention — exporting the intellectual rigour of US academic urology into settings where that rigour can transform patient lives at scale. Not a technology transfer programme. A partnership of equals.

10
Satellite
Centres
10–15
US Anchor
Centres
$200K
Total
Budget
6
Session
Formats

The deficit is not volume.
It is structure.

Across India and the developing world, urology training programs suffer not from a lack of clinical exposure — surgical volumes are often high — but from a profound deficit in structured educational architecture. Residents may perform hundreds of procedures without ever experiencing a rigorous case analysis, an evidence-based conference, or a systematically facilitated mortality review.

The MAP Urology Training Network proposes to establish 10 satellite partnerships — primarily in India, with selected centres in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America — anchored with an existing network of high-powered US academic centres.

"This is not a technology transfer program. It is a cognitively driven educational intervention — one that exports the intellectual rigor of US academic urology into settings where that rigor can transform patient lives on a scale."

Strengths matched to needs.
A genuinely symbiotic collaboration.

US centres collaborate on the merit of their strength in a particular area; the Foundation finds a match with similar interest and high patient volume. The collaboration is designed to be mutually enriching — not a one-way transfer of knowledge.

US Anchor Centres

  • Subspecialty expertise across all domains
  • Evidence-based systematic practice culture
  • Standardisation of training and practice
  • Publication & research methodology
  • Structured simulation curriculum
  • M&M facilitation experience

India Satellites (6–7)

  • High surgical volume, diverse case mix
  • Strong resident cohort motivation
  • Locally relevant disease patterns
  • Low-resource innovation potential
  • Unstructured real-world outcome data

Global Satellites (3–4)

  • Africa, Latin America, SE Asia, Middle East
  • High patient burden, low structured training
  • Motivated faculty leadership in place
  • English-language capacity for sessions
  • Opportunity to scale quality care via technology

Six formats.
Every satellite commits to at least four per year.

Sessions are accessible to the entire regional/national resident and fellow cohort — recorded and archived on the MAP shared platform.

01
Complex Case Expert Panel Conference
The satellite presents a complex, anonymised case. A panel of global experts engages in real-time discussion of diagnostic workup, treatment decision-making, technical considerations, and outcome review. A 'best available evidence' presentation by the US anchor resident versus the satellite team's clinical reality.
Monthly · 90 minutes · Resident-presented, expert-facilitated · Recorded & archived
02
Mortality & Morbidity Fishbone Review
A complication is presented fully anonymised — not to assign blame but to extract maximum educational value. The Ishikawa causal analysis framework structures discussion across six domains. The 'What if' axis forces residents to reason prospectively from retrospective data, developing the clinical judgement a textbook cannot teach.
Bi-monthly · 60–75 minutes · US expert facilitator · Non-punitive culture
03
Surgical Video Critique Masterclass
The resident submits an edited, annotated surgical video (10–15 minutes, key steps only). The US expert reviews it pre-session and prepares a structured critique covering anatomical identification, instrument economy, critical dissection quality, hemostasis decisions, and case pacing.
Monthly · 45 minutes · Written feedback within 48 hours · Standardised critique rubric
04
Dual-Centre Journal Club Plus
A landmark paper selected jointly. A satellite resident presents with full critical appraisal. The 'Plus' component: the US anchor comments on how the evidence changed their practice; the satellite responds with why the evidence does or does not translate to their setting — generating contextual intelligence neither centre can produce alone.
Monthly · 45 minutes · Paper selected 2 weeks in advance · Both centres prepare independently
05
Cross-Centre Simulation Sprint
A simulation module designed jointly — calibrated to be achievable at the satellite's resource level. Both centres execute the same task and report performance against a shared rubric, creating cross-centre benchmarking and forcing the US anchor to design truly low-cost simulation.
Quarterly · 2 hours task + 30 min debrief · Shared rubric · Performance data aggregated over time
06
Resident Innovation Challenge
Each quarter a prompt is issued: 'Solve this clinical problem using resources costing no more than $500.' Residents submit proposals; the US expert panel selects the most promising idea for mentored implementation — inverting the power dynamic productively.
Quarterly · Async submission (2 weeks) · Live pitch & panel evaluation · Top idea mentored to implementation

What the Fishbone
actually examines

Domain What is examined Example question
Patient factors Comorbidities, compliance, presentation delay, social context Would earlier presentation have changed outcome?
Decision-making Diagnostic reasoning, treatment selection, intervention timing At what point was the critical decision made, and why?
Surgical technique Intraoperative choices, technical errors, anatomical variation Was the complication preventable with a different approach?
System & environment Equipment availability, staffing, theatre time, protocols Did system constraints force a suboptimal choice?
Team & communication Handover quality, escalation, team dynamics Was there a moment where better communication would have changed course?
"What if" analysis Counterfactual review of each key decision point If we had done X instead of Y at step 3, what is the plausible alternative trajectory?

A disciplined cadence that creates
lasting academic culture.

These mechanisms maintain continuity across all 10 partnerships without material additional expenditure.

Weekly
Digital Hub
Case queries, article shares, dataset updates, resident peer learning — near zero cost.
Monthly ×2
Live Sessions
Complex case + video critique or journal club — alternating formats. Facilitator time only.
Bi-monthly
M&M Fishbone
Structured mortality review, fishbone documentation, expert commentary. Facilitator time only.
Quarterly
Network Session
All 10 satellites — challenge results, innovation showcase, cross-centre learning.
Quarterly
Innovation Sprint
Problem prompt, proposal review, live pitch evaluation. Panel time only.
Annual
Hybrid Summit
Outcomes showcase, awards, MAPP Fellow recognition. Full network convenes.

The MAP Resident Fellow

Each satellite nominates one resident annually as the MAP Resident Fellow — the operational engine of the collaboration. They receive named recognition in all programme communications, a letter of collaboration for applications, priority co-authorship in joint publications, and eligibility for a purpose-specific observership at the US anchor centre. Duration decided case by case.

$200,000 total.
50% goes directly to satellites.

Seed grants to 10 satellite centres
$10,000 / centre
$100,000
Central programme coordination (0.2 FTE) $20,000
Annual hybrid summit $20,000
Digital platform setup & annual hosting $15,000
Virtual session facilitation support
$1,500 / pair
$15,000
Monitoring, evaluation & publication support $15,000
Contingency & MAP Fellow recognition $15,000
Total $200,000

Allocation Breakdown

Satellite seed grants
50%
Programme coordination
10%
Annual hybrid summit
10%
Digital platform
7.5%
Facilitation support
7.5%
M&E & publications
7.5%
Contingency & recognition
7.5%

Measured in care delivered
to patients we will never meet.

Training Metrics

  • Case conferences conducted per year
  • M&M fishbone reviews completed
  • Surgical video critiques with written feedback
  • Simulation sprints with benchmarking data
  • MAPP Resident Fellow retention
  • Participants' feedback on behavioural change

Research Metrics

  • Joint publications or abstracts per year
  • Culture of collaboration documented
  • Patient records in outcome databases
  • Ethics approvals at satellite sites
  • Registry enrolments across network
  • Innovation proposals implemented

Patient Impact Metrics

  • 12-month functional outcome data per cohort
  • Documented pathway improvements per site
  • Patient education initiatives delivered
  • Consent quality audits completed
  • Community outreach sessions conducted
"

Every fishbone from a satellite centre carries lessons that no Hopkins conference room has seen. Every video critique shapes a surgeon who will operate on thousands of patients we will never meet. The true return on this investment is measured in the quality of care delivered to patients in Chennai, Nairobi, and Lima by urologists who were trained, challenged, and mentored through this programme.

MAPP Satellite Urology Training Network · Programme Design Note · 2025–2026
Scroll to Top